Saturday, September 16, 2006

Saturday

I was so blotto yesterday that I forgot to let y'all know that I succeeded in handing in something to my committee yesterday afternoon. There are still things I know I need to do, but I think the basic shap of stuff is sketched out.

Friday, September 15, 2006

Friday 10:44

Still not done, but very close. Closing down the browser again...

Thursday, September 14, 2006

4:30

So I just took a massive break--talked with EK and then went to the gym. I feel refreshed energized and now I have to go finish my effin' dissertation.

To that end I am going to close my browser. (gulp)

Thursday 1:25

Procrastination! Must finish reorganization TODAY. It is lovely that the Republicans continue to say horrifying things and make asses of themselves, but I must STOP surfing the web. Must FINISH. I want to be Dr. Abby. This really isn't THAT hard. If I could only focus for more than 5 minutes at a time...

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Here we go again

Man, ET just doesn't stop bugging me. So I saw an article today on SSRN written by a guy whose work I tend to like, LC. So I start to read it and see all sorts of references to ET. So I read more closely. It turns out that ET has finally gotten off his ass and submitted the paper that was the only surviving piece of the project from hell that we worked on together. (My dissertation is the other constructive result.)

Well, way back when, back when he was feeling all guilty about how I had been treated by ZVP et al (see this post for more), he offered me authorship on the paper, since some of my lit review had ended up in the paper. It was the typically confusing conversation that I tend to have with ET where I always walk away not really knowing what was said, but my impression was that I would have my name on the paper as 3rd author if I wanted it, and that we would revisit once it became relevant.

Well, according to the citation in this paper I saw today, the paper is being published as a sole author paper by ET. What is worse, LC's paper paraphrases some of the lit review from ET's paper, and those paraphrases sound awfully familiar, meaning that ET didn't cut that stuff out, meaning (maybe) that my work is still in "his" paper.

Now, I'm not sure what claim I have to authorship. There are definitely circles in which someone can do a heck of a lot more than a lit review and still not get an authorship credit, but man, he offered it to me! And I could use it. Worse, the second author on the paper did a hell of a lot of good technical work for ET and she sure as hell deserves authorship. So I don't know where he gets off getting sole author credit.

There may be extenuating circumstances, but geeze, that man bugs the shit out of me.

Wow

Watch this.

Ah ha!

I ripped my photo of the WTC, posted yesterday, from Brad DeLong's website, which he has reprised today. Thanks Brad.

Well, okay, I guess

I'm not going to finish tonight. No perfectly neat 5 year period in my life. But perhaps that is okay. The end is in sight and I have grown past the need for perfect symbolism. And I am glad I spent a large chunk of today reflecting on the past 5 years, even if that means that I still have more work to do.

Monday, September 11, 2006

Reflections

I had (have) ambitions to finish my revisions today. This morning, it became even more important to me to do so when the symbolism of finishing today hit me (more on that in a moment). I am not getting very far in achieving this goal, however, since I have frittered most of the day away in reading 9/11 rememberances online and getting used to the Office 2003 that was thrust upon my computer. (Thank god my real work is now Windows-free. I would really go crazy otherwise.)

So in the hopes of getting something out of my system so that I might get closer to my goal, I thought I'd blog a little of the things I have been thinking about today.

September 11, 2001, totally changed the direction of my life. And now that I have gotten used to those changes, and they fit me so well, it is good to look back and remind myself that the me that is me is not inevitable, but chosen, and something I want to continue to work at. Also, I feel an enormous debt of gratitude and guilt to the tragedy of so many that has indirectly given me so much hope. I want always to acknowledge that debt.

Five years ago, I was a struggling opera singer in NYC and so miserable I didn't even know how miserable I was. The only bright spot in my daily life was my day job (well, evening job) of teaching GMAT review courses, mostly downtown. When the towers fell, the most devestating personal realization I had was that I did not know if the people who mattered the most to me, who made my days bearable--my students--were alive. Not only that, but that I was such a small part of their lives that no one would know to tell me that they were dead. The utter barrenness of this was shattering.

Fortunately, every single student I ever had survived that day. I closely scanned the lists of the dead as they were compiled and never found a name I recognized. I had students who escaped the towers, one was a Morgan Stanley employee who made it down from around the 85th floor as part of that company's miracle due all to John O'Neill, their security advisor who started evacuations before the second plane hit, saving thousands. A couple were bruised and cut by debris, but all lived.

In all of this, I also realized that my music, which had been an all-consuming antidote to loneliness and shyness since I was about 5, was not a source of comfort or inspiration. Instead, I was mad at myself. I had so many idle interests in politics, foreign affairs, emergency medicine, all of which seemed useful in those days. But I never had the confidence or courage to do anything about my interests or abilities, and until the fall of 2001, I thought it didn't matter. I thought if I wasted my life in the utterly selfish pursuit of my singing dreams, it wouldn't matter. No one would care. And if I clung to music, no matter how unfulfilling and boring it was in the day-to-day grind, I wouldn't have to face challenges, disappointment, failure, and all the things that I thought came with actually living.

But the gift September 11 gave me (and I am very aware of how ghoulish and selfish that sounds) was a sense of urgency. Both from the knowledge that we as a civilization still have fights to fight, and smart, honorable people are not a commodity we can afford to waste and from the knowledge that my life was precious, fragile, and, at the time, wasting away.

I think I would have stopped singing eventually, but probably not for another few years. I don't know whether I would have chosen policy afterwards or not. But that day made the decisions easy and quick. I stopped pursuing singing in October or November and was writing applications to graduate schools full time starting around Thanksgiving.

I started talking to my students outside of class, getting to know them and in small ways and large, befriending them, rather than caring for them from a distance. I stopped waiting to be noticed by others and started reaching out, taking the first step.

Once I got to grad school the changes started positive feed-back loops to the point where I am barely recognizable to myself, when I stop to think about it. And all of the glorious things that I know about, too: economics, statistics, minutae of al Qaeda, education policy, accounting, markov chains, linear programming, SAS, STATA, LaTeX, Mathematica, risk analysis, rowing, California, trans-continental plane routes, Argentina, burping babies, full moon hikes, pregnancy tests, red meat, sex on the beach, martinis....

I might be done with my PhD in a matter of days, and I might be done with this phase of my life in a matter of weeks. My goal for the next step is to first continue what I have learned here: that life matters, that my time is precious, that I have a lot to share. Second, I want to find ways to reconcile my past with my present. I want to find ways to sing again. Not in the cut-throat world of profesisonal opera, but somehow. Join a bluegrass band or sing the blues.

Okay. Onwards.

I miss you


(I took this photo off the web years ago, and don't know who to attribute it to. I'm sorry. I love the photo and it means a lot to me, if that is any help.)

Sunday, September 10, 2006

Why?

Why do I feel so guilty?

I just worked in a reasoned paragraph pointing out the myriad of obvious logical flaws in ZVP's awarding winning article on audit quality. The reason I am discussing it is because it is an excellent and particularly clean example of the kind of problem that a lot of accounting research suffers from. And yet I feel like it is pulsing with some sort of neon vomit yellow-green color that all readers will see and say, ah-hah, this chick is spiteful and we should ignore all 236 pages of this dissertation because she is just making ad hominem attacks!

I do not like ZVP as a person. She has attacked my character (as a human being, not as a researcher) and taken some fairly extreme measures to make me look bad to my colleagues and to shut me up. She is a tenured professor doing this to a graduate student in a different field, at a different institution.

It is okay for me not to like her. It would be weird for me not to cite any of her work, since she has been a major researcher of issues related to my dissertation. I have a responsibility to science to discuss her work responsibly, which includes pointing out that it does not support the conclusions she says it supports (or, equally supports totally opposite conclusions). To say this is not an ad hominum attack. To say this is my job.

Why do I feel guilty?

P.S.

Months after submission and getting agreements from my committee that it passed the test, I finally have a fully signed prospectus, ET's name included.

'Nuff said

I resolve to do it. Including the unpleasant part of getting to done.

What I want

To be done with my dissertation (which, unfortunately, is different from finishing my dissertation).